Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
5 years IF: 1.036 (® Thomson Reuters)
IF 2016: 1.064 (® Thomson Reuters)
Total Cites: 7140
Follow Us
Follow Us
  • Users Online: 409
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
  Search
 
   Ahead Of Print
  
 
     Search Pubmed for
 
    -  Zhang HY
    -  Li QY
    -  Wu ZH
    -  Zhao Y
    -  Qiu GX
    Download PDF Version


Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed134    
    PDF Downloaded14    

Recommend this journal

 

Previous Article   Table of Contents   Next Article
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Ahead of print publication
 

Lumbar Scoliosis Induction in Juvenile Dogs by Three-dimensional Modulation of Spinal Growth Using Nickel-Titanium Coil Springs


 Department of Orthopaedics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China

Date of Submission15-Jun-2017
Date of Web Publication31-Aug-2017

Correspondence Address:
Qi-Yi Li,
Department of Orthopaedics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730
China
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

 

  Abstract 


Background: Current treatments for scoliosis have some defects and complications. To study spinal deformities and test novel scoliosis treatments, many animal models of scoliosis have been developed. These models applied a single load to the spine and could not precisely modulate the spinal growth in different dimensions. In this study, we applied posterior tethering in various directions with the application of nickel-titanium (NT) coil springs in dog's spine to modulate spinal growth in the coronal, sagittal, and transverse planes and create a scoliosis model possess curves that mimic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) three dimensionally.
Methods: Scoliosis was surgically induced in eight 8-week-old female dogs (weight: 1.95–2.30 kg) using bone screws and NT coil springs. The deformity was induced through the placement of posterior NT coil springs that tethered the spine by bone screw fixation. All dogs were monitored with serial radiographs to document changes in deformities.
Results: All experimental animals developed scoliotic curves convex to the left in the lumbar segment. The mean coronal Cobb angle was 18.0° immediately postoperatively and 54.5° at 22 weeks. The mean lordosis increased from 6.2° postoperatively to 35.0° at final follow-up. Apical axial rotation increased from 4.5° postoperatively to 31.2° at 22 weeks.
Conclusions: With the application of NT springs in dogs that allowed posterior tethering in various directions, lumbar spinal deformity was achieved in three planes: coronal, sagittal, and transverse planes. Notably, the lumbar spine in surgically treated dogs developed lordoscoliosis with obvious rotation and the curves mimic AIS three dimensionally well. This method allows lumbar scoliosis to develop without deep dissection of muscle and maintains the essential anatomical elements along the spinal curve. Moreover, the spinal growth modulation technique could yield information that would provide a basis for developing novel early-stage treatments for children with scoliosis.


Keywords: Asymmetric Load; Growth Modulation; Nonfusion; Scoliosis Model



How to cite this URL:
Zhang HY, Li QY, Wu ZH, Zhao Y, Qiu GX. Lumbar Scoliosis Induction in Juvenile Dogs by Three-dimensional Modulation of Spinal Growth Using Nickel-Titanium Coil Springs. Chin Med J [Epub ahead of print] [cited 2017 Oct 16]. Available from: http://www.cmj.org/preprintarticle.asp?id=213910





  Introduction Top


Current treatment options for scoliosis are not ideal and many approaches have limitations and complications. Bracing is the only nonoperative treatment, but this approach only stops the progression of spinal curvature in a growing child and does not typically reduce the degree of curve that is already present.[1] Moreover, most bracing regimens require that braces should be worn 23 h a day, which can cause skin irritation and discomfort.

Severe scoliosis cases require surgery to correct the spinal deformity. The spinal fusions provide better deformity correction, but render the patient with reduced mobile segments postoperatively and set the stage for future sagittal plane issues in late adulthood. Thus, spinal fusion is not the ideal treatment for lumbar scoliosis.

For many years, fusionless surgery has been used to treat infantile and juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. More than 45 years ago, Roaf attempted to modulate spine growth by ablating convex epiphyseal cartilage and adjacent discs at the vertebra near the apex of the curve.[2] Currently, growing rod surgery is the main fusionless technique used to treat scoliosis. Although the approach produces acceptable results,[3],[4],[5],[6] there are some complications associated with this approach,[7],[8] and it often requires final fusion surgery.

Previous studies indicate that the asymmetric load from an erect posture plays an important role in the development of scoliosis,[9],[10],[11],[12] and several experiments have demonstrated that mechanical factors contribute to the progression of scoliosis.[13],[14],[15],[16] To study spinal deformity and test novel scoliosis treatments, many animal models of scoliosis have been developed in the recent years. Most of these models used mechanical tethering techniques to create an asymmetric load. Tethering techniques are considered to be the most reliable approaches for generating animal models of spinal deformity;[17],[18],[19],[20],[21] however, there are some limitations. The growth of each single segment cannot be modulated separately, and the spinal curve then progresses slowly. Moreover, scoliosis is characterized by a three-dimensional spinal deformity.[22] A single tethering was hard to address deformities in the three dimensions simultaneously.

The bone growth depends on the amount of growth plate compression. Our previous study [23] demonstrated that nickel-titanium (NT) coil springs could be used to modulate spinal growth through the application of asymmetric compression to the vertebral growth plate, but it only applied a single spring load to the lumbar spine and could not modulate the spinal growth in different dimensions. The purpose of this study was to develop a scoliosis model by modulating spinal growth in the coronal, sagittal, and transverse planes using NT coil springs.


  Methods Top


Ethical approval

All experiments were conducted in accordance with regulations from the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Ethical Committee of the Peking Union Medical College Hospital.

Experimental animals

Eight female mongrel dogs (age: 8 weeks; weight: 1.95–2.30 kg) were obtained from the experimental animal center of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The 8-week-old female dogs were newly weaned and retained sufficient growth potential for the duration of the study.

Nickel-titanium coil springs and bone screws

NT coil springs (TOMY International Inc., Japan) with a free length of 3.0 mm were selected for the study [Figure 1]. Heavy springs (load: 200 g) with superelastic properties allowing for soft, stabilized, and sustainable tension were used. According to the manufacturer's information on NT coil spring weight ranges, 200 g of spring tension could be maintained 4.0 mm to 15 mm from the spring.
Figure 1: The nickel-titanium coil spring.

Click here to view


The bone screws are self-drilling (Titanium Alloy, Xiji Inc., China) and had lengths of 20 mm or 30 mm [Figure 2]. The thread length accounted for 80% (20 mm screws) or 50% (30 mm screws) of the total length, and the screw diameters were 1.5 mm and 2.0 mm in the threaded and nonthreaded portions, respectively.
Figure 2: The bone screw.

Click here to view


Surgical protocol

After preoperative placement of a fentanyl patch (12 h preoperative), dogs were sedated with propofol (5–10 mg/kg), intubated, and then maintained on Zoletil (5–10 mg·kg −1·h −1) and Forane ® (minimum alveolar concentration, 1.5%). Lidocaine mucilage was used to facilitate intubation. Peri-operative prophylactic antibiotics were also given. Cephalexin (30 mg/kg) was given intravenously on induction, and intramuscular injections (20 mg·kg −1·d −1) were given for 3 days after surgery.

Dogs were placed in a prone position on a grounding pad, and the lumbar region was shaved, followed by sterile prep and draping. A midline posterior skin incision from T13 to the L6 level was used to gain access to the subcutaneous lipoid space, and the space was then enlarged to the right side by blunt dissection. The left vertebral pedicles (L2–L4), right vertebral pedicles (L1–L5), and right transverse processes (L1–L5) were identified by C-arm fluoroscopy and marked with 25-gauge needles (0.7 mm diameter, 38 mm length; Becton Dickinson, S.A., Spain). The needles were then drilled into the vertebral bodies from the vertebral pedicles or the roots of the right transverse processes. After removal of the needles, bone screws (20 mm screws for vertebral pedicles and 30 mm screws for transverse processes) were fixed into the resulting holes in the vertebral bodies such that the screw heads were on the muscle surface [Figure 3]. The NT coil springs were secured to the screws using a stainless steel ligature (Xihubiom Inc., China). Posteroanterior and lateral radiographs of the spine taken immediately after the operation showed the pattern of tethering using NT coil springs [Figure 4]. The right lateral longitudinally tethered springs modulated spinal growth in the coronal plane to create scoliosis, the posterior longitudinally tethered springs connecting right pedicle screws applied loads to modulate spinal growth mainly in the sagittal plane to create lordosis, whereas the diagonal springs provided torques to L2-L4 to create axial rotation. Wound closure proceeded through absorbable sutures. Postoperative analgesia was provided through proper dosing of fentanyl patches.
Figure 3: Fixation of bone screws into vertebral bodies through the muscle.

Click here to view
Figure 4: Posteroanterior and lateral radiographs of the spine immediately after surgery.

Click here to view


Postoperative follow-up

Dogs were observed for up to 22 weeks, and posteroanterior and lateral radiographs were taken at postoperative weeks 0, 1, 2, and then at 5-week intervals to document the progression of the deformity [Table 1] and [Figure 4],[Figure 5],[Figure 6],[Figure 7]. At the end of week 22, the dogs were more than 7 months old and had passed through the growth spurt of puberty whereupon the spinal deformity progression gradually ceased.[23],[24] Axial rotation was measured using a computed tomography (CT) scanner (GE Discovery CT 750 HD) at weeks 0 and 22 after the operation [Figure 8]. Dogs were sedated before radiographic acquisition to ensure that standardized films were obtained.
Figure 5: Posteroanterior and lateral radiographs of the spine two weeks after surgery.

Click here to view
Figure 6: Posteroanterior and lateral radiographs of the spine 7 weeks after surgery.

Click here to view
Figure 7: Posteroanterior and lateral radiographs of the spine 22 weeks after surgery.

Click here to view
Figure 8: Computed tomography images of initial axial rotation (a) and final axial rotation (b) after surgery.

Click here to view
Table 1: Postoperative degrees of spine deformity (L1–L5) of postoperative dogs (°)

Click here to view


Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software version 19.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Progression of the deformity between radiographic data acquisition points was shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and evaluated using Student's t-test, with a level of significance set as P < 0.05.


  Results Top


Preoperative radiographs of all dogs confirmed that none had preexisting scoliosis. Of the eight dogs that were enrolled in this study, two had NT coil spring fracture and were excluded before the study completion. Of the remaining six experimental animals, no dogs developed postoperative complications or neurological deficits, and all postoperative dogs could move freely within 1 week of surgery.

All the six dogs with spring-tethered lumbar spines developed a progressive structural lordoscoliotic deformity associated with axial rotation of the vertebral body during the 22-week observation period [Figure 9].
Figure 9: Computed tomography scan with three-dimensional reconstruction of the spinal deformity. The front view (a), the side view (b), and the back view (c) of the reconstructed spinal deformity.

Click here to view


The average initial coronal Cobb angle was 18.0 ± 2.6° (range: 15.0–22.0°) immediately after the operation, which progressed to 54.5 ± 3.7° on an average (range: 50.0–59.0°) over 22 weeks. The average progression of 36.5 ± 1.6° (range: 34.0–38.0°) was statistically significant (t = −54.4, P < 0.001). The degrees of scoliosis were not statistically significantly altered between 7 and 22 weeks after the operation (week 7 vs. 22, t = −1.5, P = 0.203). In the sagittal plane, the average initial lordosis progressed from 6.2 ± 1.2° (range: 5.0–8.0°) immediately after surgery to 35.0 ± 2.8° on an average (range: 31.0–39.0°) at the final follow-up. The progression of 28.8 ± 1.9° (range: 26.0–32.0°) in the sagittal plane was found to be statistically significant (t = −36.4, P < 0.001). The degrees of lordosis were not statistically significantly altered between 17 and 22 weeks after the operation (week 17 vs. 22, t = −0.5, P = 0.611). The average initial axial rotation measured by CT scan was 4.5 ± 1.0° (range: 3.0–6.0°) immediately after the operation and progressed to 31.2 ± 3.8° (range: 26.0–36.0°) on an average by the end of the observation period [Figure 8]. The average progression of 26.7 ± 4.1° (range: 22.0–31.0°) was statistically significant (t = −16.0, P < 0.001).


  Discussion Top


The asymmetric load is known to play an important role in the development of scoliosis. The pathological compression inhibits vertebral growth on one side of the spine while reduced compression accelerates the longitudinal vertebral growth of the other side of the spine.[25] In earlier animal models of scoliosis, the mechanism by which scoliosis is formed involved tethering techniques (rigid and flexible) to fix the longitudinal length of the torso. As such, subsequent development of the deformity depended on the growth potential of the animal, and scoliosis models were not as severe as human patients. Our study established a lumbar segment scoliosis model in immature dogs that creates progressive, structural, idiopathic-type, marked lordoscoliotic curve convex to the left with axial rotation of the apical vertebral body. The curve progression of previous tethering models depends on the growth potential. Long tethering periods are required for the development of curves, which consume the majority of the animals' rapid growth period. Our study establishes a dog model for progressive lumbar scoliosis in a short amount of time. Our previous study demonstrated that the scoliosis model could maintain stable scoliotic curves after spring removal as the animals approached sexual maturity.[23] We found that the deformity progressed rapidly in the early stages after spring implant surgery, partly because of the better flexibility of the spine in dogs at an early age and partly because of the rapid growth during this time. Moreover, the tension of the NT coil springs remained basically unchanged as the dogs aged. Thus, the ratio of the spring tension to animal body weight dropped with age and the same tension had less of an influence on spinal growth of older and bigger dogs.

Scoliosis is a three-dimensional spinal deformity. Classical tethering models can only apply a force to the spine in one direction, which makes modulating spinal growth simultaneously in three dimensions challenging. Moreover, it is hard to control which segment is going to be the apex of the curve. In our study, we applied multiple NT coil springs to tether each segment of the lumbar spine. The posterior longitudinally tethered springs applied loads to modulate spinal growth mainly in the sagittal plane, whereas lateral longitudinally tethered springs modulated spinal growth in the coronal plane, and diagonal springs provided torque to create axial rotation. Thus, the three-dimensional, fusionless modulation of spinal growth described in this study represents advancement over previous tethering techniques, and the curve shape of this model is more similar to scoliosis observed in patients [Figure 9]. Moreover, the growth of each lumbar segment was modulated by NT coil springs separately, so we could determine the apex level of the curve in this model.

Each scoliosis patient is unique, and the condition may vary in shape and size. Some spine deformities are predominated by scoliosis, while others have kyphosis or rotatory deformities. As such, although the single tethering technique can create a spinal scoliosis deformity, precisely modulating spinal growth to mimic a scoliosis deformity through a single tether is difficult. The NT coil springs have five specifications ranging from 25 g to 200 g (ultralight: 25 g; extra light: 50 g; light: 100 g; medium: 150 g; and heavy: 200 g). To achieve the favorable experimental results of this study, we selected the heavy NT (200 g) coil springs. Since mechanical overloading can produce tissue trauma and accelerate disc degeneration,[26] we calculated the torque of the NT coil springs applied to the lumbar spine to ensure that the pressure at the concave side of the vertebral discs was no more than half the animal's body weight. Therefore, the loading of the NT coil springs should prevent damage to the vertebral disc. Furthermore, a combination of springs having different tensions could be used to create different three-dimensional curve shapes. For creating spinal deformities in which scoliosis predominates, an orthopedic scheme could involve heavy NT coil springs to modulate spinal growth in the coronal plane and medium or light NT coil springs to modulate spinal growth in the sagittal and transverse planes. Similarly, we can use springs that can impose larger forces to create kyphosis-based spinal deformities in the sagittal plane or rotation-based spinal deformities in the transverse plane. Each spinal experimental segment can be fixed with bone screws, and thus the vertebral growth at different spinal levels could be modulated by applying springs with different tensions. The technique developed from this preliminary study could be used to create different scoliosis shapes based on different experimental requirements.

Nowadays, lumbar scoliosis (including idiopathic and congenital scoliosis) is difficult to treat in the clinic. Bracing treatment is not effective for lumbar scoliosis because this region does not have ribs through which corrective forces can be transferred, and spinal fusion surgery renders the patient with reduced mobile segments postoperatively and sets the stage for future sagittal plane issues in late adulthood. This study describes an excellent model for lumbar scoliosis, and the method in this study maintains the essential elements along the curve. The screw-setting technique in our study is borrowed from mini-invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, which avoids deep dissection of muscle [Figure 3], maintains essential elements along the spinal curve, and allows for faster recovery. Indeed, all the dogs in this study could move freely within 1 week of surgery, suggesting that the tethering technique in this study is a minimally invasive method to create scoliosis.

Although the positive results of this animal model of scoliosis were notable, several problems need to be resolved. The NT coil spring tension was suitable for the demands of this study, but the spring strength was insufficient. Of the eight dogs that were enrolled in this study, two had NT coil spring fracture. The NT coil springs used in this study were originally designed for orthodontic applications, so the NT springs would likely need to be completely redesigned for use in spine in order to meet the strength requirements of orthopedic procedures. Furthermore, we must determine the optimal NT coil spring tension that would allow spinal growth modulation but avoid tissue trauma or acceleration of disc degeneration.

Current nonfusion treatments (e.g., growing rod technique) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis have achieved acceptable results.[3] However, the growing-rod surgery often involves complications,[7],[8] and many patients treated with this approach require final fusion surgery. NT coil springs are commonly and successfully used in orthodontics, but they have not yet been used for scoliosis treatment. Despite the limitations that need to be addressed, the spinal growth modulation technique involving NT springs described in this study could yield information that would provide a basis for developing novel early-stage treatments for children with scoliosis.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Maruyama T, Kobayashi Y, Miura M, Nakao Y. Effectiveness of brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 2015;10 Suppl 2:S12. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-10-S2-S12.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Roaf R. The treatment of progressive scoliosis by unilateral growth-arrest. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1963;45:637-51.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Caniklioglu M, Gokce A, Ozturkmen Y, Gokay NS, Atici Y, Uzumcugil O, et al. Clinical and radiological outcome of the growing rod technique in the management of scoliosis in young children. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2012;46:379-84. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2012.2847.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Wang S, Zhang J, Qiu G, Wang Y, Weng X, Guo J, et al. One-stage posterior osteotomy with short segmental fusion and dual growing rod technique for severe rigid congenital scoliosis: The preliminary clinical outcomes of a hybrid technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:E294-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000119.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Wang S, Zhang J, Qiu G, Li S, Yu B, Weng X, et al. Posterior hemivertebra resection with bisegmental fusion for congenital scoliosis: More than 3 year outcomes and analysis of unanticipated surgeries. Eur Spine J 2013;22:387-93. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2577-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Wang S, Zhang J, Qiu G, Wang Y, Li S, Zhao Y, et al. Dual growing rods technique for congenital scoliosis: More than 2 years outcomes: Preliminary results of a single center. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:E1639-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318273d6bf.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Watanabe K, Uno K, Suzuki T, Kawakami N, Tsuji T, Yanagida H, et al. Risk factors for complications associated with growing-rod surgery for early-onset scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:E464-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318288671a.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Bess S, Akbarnia BA, Thompson GH, Sponseller PD, Shah SA, El Sebaie H, et al. Complications of growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis: Analysis of one hundred and forty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:2533-43. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01471.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Machida M, Murai I, Miyashita Y, Dubousset J, Yamada T, Kimura J, et al. Pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. Experimental study in rats. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:1985-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199910010-00004.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Stehbens WE. Pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis revisited. Exp Mol Pathol 2003;74:49-60. doi: 10.1006/exmp.2002.2478.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Castelein RM, van Dieën JH, Smit TH. The role of dorsal shear forces in the pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis – A hypothesis. Med Hypotheses 2005;65:501-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2005.03.025.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Xiao J, Wu ZH, Qiu GX, Yang XY, Li JY, Weng XS, et al. Upright posture impact on spine susceptibility in scoliosis and progression patterns of scoliotic curve (in Chinese). Natl Med J China 2007;87:48-52.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Mente PL, Aronsson DD, Stokes IA, Iatridis JC. Mechanical modulation of growth for the correction of vertebral wedge deformities. J Orthop Res 1999;17:518-24. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100170409.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Mente PL, Stokes IA, Spence H, Aronsson DD. Progression of vertebral wedging in an asymmetrically loaded rat tail model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22:1292-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199706150-00003.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Stokes IA, Spence H, Aronsson DD, Kilmer N. Mechanical modulation of vertebral body growth. implications for scoliosis progression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:1162-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199605150-00007.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Rubin CT, Lanyon LE. Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:397-402.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Braun JT, Ogilvie JW, Akyuz E, Brodke DS, Bachus KN, Stefko RM, et al. Experimental scoliosis in an immature goat model: A method that creates idiopathic-type deformity with minimal violation of the spinal elements along the curve. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:2198-203. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000085095.37311.46.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Newton PO, Faro FD, Farnsworth CL, Shapiro GS, Mohamad F, Parent S, et al. Multilevel spinal growth modulation with an anterolateral flexible tether in an immature bovine model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:2608-13. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000188267.66847.bf.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Smith RM, Dickson RA. Experimental structural scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987;69:576-81.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Lowe TG, Wilson L, Chien JT, Line BG, Klopp L, Wheeler D, et al. A posterior tether for fusionless modulation of sagittal plane growth in a sheep model. Spine 2005; 30 17 Suppl:S69-74. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000175175.41471.d4.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Schwab F, Patel A, Lafage V, Farcy JP. A porcine model for progressive thoracic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:E397-404. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a27156.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Leboeuf D, Letellier K, Alos N, Edery P, Moldovan F. Do estrogens impact adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Trends Endocrinol Metab 2009;20:147-52. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2008.12.004.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Zhang H, Wang C, Wang W, Wu Z, Qiu G. Novel experimental scoliosis model in immature rat using nickel-titanium coil spring. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:E1179-88. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182999757.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Parent S, Newton PO, Wenger DR. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Etiology, anatomy, natural history, and bracing. Instr Course Lect 2005;54:529-36.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Mehlman CT, Araghi A, Roy DR. Hyphenated history: The Hueter-Volkmann law. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 1997;26:798-800.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Stokes IA, Iatridis JC. Mechanical conditions that accelerate intervertebral disc degeneration: Overload versus immobilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:2724-32. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000146049.52152.da.  Back to cited text no. 26
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
Previous Article  Next Article

    

京ICP备05052599号