Home About us Articles Multimedia Search Instructions Login 
IF 2017: 1.596 (® Clarivate Analytics)
Total Cites: 7606
Q2 in Medicine, General & Internal
Follow Us
Follow Us
  • Users Online: 1756
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 131  |  Issue : 21  |  Page : 2566-2574

Association between Maternal Weight Indicators and Iron Deficiency Anemia during Pregnancy: A Cohort Study

1 Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center and CREAT Group, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, China
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, China
3 School of Information Engineering, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, China

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Xing-Hui Liu
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.244109

Rights and Permissions

Background: The effect of maternal weights on the risk of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) during pregnancy remains unclear. The study aimed to investigate the association between maternal weight indicators and IDA during pregnancy. Methods: We conducted a cohort study to examine the association between maternal weight indicators, including prepregnancy body mass index and the rate of gestational weight gain (GWG), and the risk of IDA among Chinese pregnant women. Data about new-onset IDA at different trimesters from a national cross-sectional survey were collected; information regarding baseline variables and rate of GWG from women participating in the survey were retrospectively collected. Tested IDA and reported IDA were documented. Multilevel logistic regression to examine the association between maternal weight indicators and the risk of IDA after adjusting for potential confounders was conducted. Results: This study enrolled 11,782 pregnant women from 24 hospitals from September 19, 2016, to November 20, 2016. Among those, 1515 (12.9%) IDA events were diagnosed through test (test IDA); 3915 (33.3%) were identified through test and patient reporting (composite IDA). After adjusting for confounders and cluster effect of hospitals, underweight pregnant women, compared with normal women, were associated with higher risk of test IDA (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17–1.57 and composite IDA (aOR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.21–1.51); on the contrary, overweight and obese women had lower risk of test IDA (aOR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54–0.86 overweight; aOR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13–0.69 obese) and composite IDA (aOR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.67–0.90 overweight; aOR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.21–0.55 obese). The higher rate of GWG was associated with higher risk of IDA (test aOR: 1.86 95% CI: 1.26–2.76; composite aOR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.16–2.03). Conclusions: Pregnant women who are underweight before pregnancy and who have faster GWG are more likely to develop IDA. Enforced weight control during pregnancy and use of iron supplements, particularly among underweight women, may be warranted.


 Abstract in Chinese





结果:从2016年9月19日到2016年11月20日,我们从中国24家医院总共纳入11,782例孕妇。其中,1515 (12.9%)例发生经实验室诊断的缺铁性贫血,3915 (33.3%)发生复合缺铁性贫血(经实验室诊断和孕妇自报任意一种情况)。在调整了混杂和医院间的聚集效应后,我们发现:孕前低体重孕妇,相比于孕前体重正常孕妇,有更高的缺铁性贫血风险(实验室诊断缺铁性贫血:aOR:1.35, 95%CI :1.17-1.57 ;复合缺铁性贫血:aOR: 1.35, 95%CI :1.21-1.51);相反,孕前超重和肥胖的孕妇有更低的经实验室诊断的缺铁性贫血风险(超重:aOR: 0.68, 95%CI: 0.54-0.86; 肥胖:aOR 0.30, 95%CI 0.13-0.69)和复合缺铁性贫血风险(超重:aOR: 0.77, 95%CI: 0.67-0.90; 肥胖:aOR: 0.34, 95%CI:0.21-0.55)。此外,更快的孕期体重增长速度也与缺铁性贫血的风险呈正相关(实验室诊断缺铁性贫血: aOR: 1.86, 95%CI: 1.26-2.76; 复合缺铁性贫血:aOR: 1.54, 95%CI :1.16-2.03)。


Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded74    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal