Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
5 years IF: 1.082 (® Thomson Reuters)
IF 2014: 1.053 (® Thomson Reuters)
Total Cites: 6666
Follow Us
Follow Us
  • Users Online: 2071
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 130  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 165-170

Novel Mutation of Cleidocranial Dysplasia-related Frameshift Runt-related Transcription Factor 2 in a Sporadic Chinese Case


1 Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
2 Central Laboratory, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China

Date of Submission25-Aug-2016
Date of Web Publication10-Jan-2017

Correspondence Address:
Jiu-Xiang Lin
Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, 22 Zhongguancun Avenue South, Haidian District, Beijing 100081
China
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.197996

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) is an autosomal dominant disease that affects the skeletal system. Common symptoms of CCD include hypoplasia or aplasia of the clavicles, delayed or even absent closure of the fontanels, midface hypoplasia, short stature, and delayed eruption of permanent and supernumerary teeth. Previous studies reported a connection between CCD and the haploinsufficiency of runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2). Here, we report a sporadic Chinese case presenting typical symptoms of CCD.
Methods: We made genetic testing on this sporadic Chinese case and identified a novel RUNX2 frameshift mutation: c.1111dupT. In situ immunofluorescence microscopy and osteocalcin promoter luciferase assay were performed to compare the functions of the RUNX2 mutation with those of wild-type RUNX2.
Results: RUNX2 mutation was observed in the perinuclear region, cytoplasm, and nuclei. In contrast, wild-type RUNX2 was confined in the nuclei, which indicated that the subcellular compartmentalization of RUNX2 mutation was partially perturbed. The transactivation function on osteocalcin promoter of the RUNX2 mutation was obviously abrogated.
Conclusions: We identified a sporadic CCD patient carrying a novel insertion/frameshift mutation of RUNX2. This finding expanded our understanding of CCD-related phenotypes.

Keywords: Cleidocranial Dysplasia; Frameshift Mutation; Runt-related Transcription Factor 2


How to cite this article:
Qin XY, Jia PZ, Zhao HX, Li WR, Chen F, Lin JX. Novel Mutation of Cleidocranial Dysplasia-related Frameshift Runt-related Transcription Factor 2 in a Sporadic Chinese Case. Chin Med J 2017;130:165-70

How to cite this URL:
Qin XY, Jia PZ, Zhao HX, Li WR, Chen F, Lin JX. Novel Mutation of Cleidocranial Dysplasia-related Frameshift Runt-related Transcription Factor 2 in a Sporadic Chinese Case. Chin Med J [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Jan 23];130:165-70. Available from: http://www.cmj.org/text.asp?2017/130/2/165/197996


  Introduction Top


Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD; OMIM 119600) is an autosomal dominant disease that affects the skeletal system. Common symptoms of CCD include hypoplasia or aplasia of the clavicles, delayed or even absent closure of fontanels, midface hypoplasia, short stature, delayed eruption or impaction of permanent and supernumerary teeth, as well as other skeletal malformations, such as wide pubic symphysis, brachycephalic skull, and abnormal mandibular ramus and coronoid process.[1],[2] Among the various phenotypic spectra of CCD, hypoplasia or aplasia of the clavicles and dental abnormalities are common. Panoramic radiography is crucial for diagnosing CCD.[3] The prevalence of CCD is about one in millions of live births in any gender or race.[4],[5]

Previous studies reported a connection between CCD and the haploinsufficiency of runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2).[6],[7],[8],[9] RUNX2 controls normal bone formation by regulating the differentiation of mesenchymal precursor cells to osteoblasts and the growth and maturation of osteoblasts. RUNX2-deficient mice lack osteoblasts and fail to form bones.[10] The RUNX2 gene has been mapped to chromosome 6p21 and consists of several established functional domains. The Runt domain, an evolutionary conserved polypeptide motif located in the N-terminal of RUNX2, mediates DNA binding and protein-protein interaction, including heterodimerization with the core-binding factor subunit beta.[11] Adjacent to the Runt domain is the nuclear localization signal, which accumulates RUNX2 in the cell nucleus.[12],[13] Furthermore, RUNX2 possesses a Q/A domain with glutamine and alanine repeats,[14] and the C-terminus consists of a transactivation proline-serine-threonine-rich (PST) domain with abundant PST.[7] The nuclear matrix-targeting signal (NMTS) is necessary for subnuclear localization and protein binding in the middle of the PST domain.[15],[16] The Val-Trp-Arg-Pro-Tyr (VWRPY) peptide that supports transcriptional repression comprises the last section of the C-terminal.

RUNX2 mutation is not observed in approximately 30% of CCD patients.[12] Previous studies have identified over eighty heterozygous RUNX2 mutations in CCD patients.[4],[13],[17],[18] RUNX2 mutations are generally located in the Runt domain, most of which are missense mutations. Only 10% of the C-terminal mutations are missense mutations.[18],[19] In the present study, we identified a novel RUNX2 mutation: c.1111dupT (p.Ser371PhefsX14), in a sporadic case.


  Methods Top


Patient selection

A Chinese individual who presented with clinical symptoms of CCD was recruited. The Ethical Committee of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology (PKUSSIRB-201627028) approved the study. Informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Genetic testing

Up to 3 ml of peripheral blood was drawn from the CCD-affected patient and stored in an anticoagulation tube containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Genomic DNA extraction from the whole blood of the patient was conducted with QIAamp® DNA Blood Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Exons 1-8 of the RUNX2 gene were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using previous combinations of primers.[13] PCR amplifications were performed in a thermal cycler (PE 2400, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California, USA) with 50 μl reaction volumes. Sequencing was performed at Life Technologies, Inc., Shanghai, China.

Plasmid DNA and mutagenesis

Plasmid vector coding-enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP): pEGFP-C1-vector and pEGFP-C1-RUNX2 plasmids were purchased from Youbio (Changsha, China). pEGFP-C1-RUNX2 plasmid was PCR amplified using human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cDNA as the template and then cloned into the pEGFP-C1-vector between KpnI/SacII sites. The primers are 5'-ACTCTCGAGATGGCATCAAACAGCCTCTT-3' (forward) and 5'-ACTCCGCGGTCAATAT GGTCGCCAAACAG-3' (reverse). The amino acid duplication of RUNX2 mutation was accomplished by PCR amplification using pEGFP-C1-RUNX2 circular plasmid as the template, 5'-AACTGGGCCCTTTTTTCAGACCCCAGG-3' as the forward primer, and 5'-CCTGGGGTCTGAAAAAAGGGCCCAGTT-3' as the reverse primer. The construct was completely sequenced and used as the template in other cloning designs.

Cell culture

HEK293T cells were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (HyClone, Logan, USA) supplemented with 100 mg/ml streptomycin and penicillin, and 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA), and then incubated in 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37°C.

Western blotting analysis

HEK293T cells were seeded and transiently transfected with pEGFP-C1-vector, pEGFP-C1-RUNX2, and pEGFP-C1-RUNX2-mut, using Vigo Transfection Reagent.

Cells were lysed in Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), NaCl, and EDTA (TNE) buffer plus protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Applied Science, Basel, Switzerland) at 4°C for 30 min. These supernatants were resolved through SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis after centrifugation. The anti-GFP antibody was used (Santa Cruz, Dallas, USA).

In situ immunofluorescence microscopy

pEGFP-C1-RUNX2 and pEGFP-C1-RUNX2-mut plasmids were separately transfected into HEK293T cells and then cultured for 24 h. Afterward, the cells were processed and washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and 0.1% triton X-100 for 5 min each. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, washed three times with PBS, and then incubated with Goat Anti-mouse IgG conjugated with Alexa Fluor 555 for 1 h at room temperature. Prolong® Gold Antifade Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) was used to mount the cover slides following three times washing with PBS. A Zeiss LSM710 (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) was used to capture immunofluorescent signals.

Transient transfection and osteocalcin promoter luciferase assay

HEK293T cells were seeded in 24-well plates one day before transfection. Cells at 60%-80% confluence were transfected in 50 μl of Vigo Transfection Reagent. The pRenilla-TK vector was used as an internal control. After 48 h of transfection, the cells were collected and measured using the luciferase assay system (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA).

Statistical analysis

All experiments were repeated at least three times. Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). SPSS software (IBM SPSS Statistics, version 20.0, IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Results were examined by Student's t-test. Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05.


  Results Top


Clinical findings

An 18-year-old female came to the hospital with a chief complaint of multiple impacted teeth. The patient showed typical clinical symptoms of CCD, including a concave profile and short stature (141 cm high). However, no abnormal hypermobility of the shoulders was found [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b. The patient did not have any family history of this disease.
Figure 1: Typical clinical and radiological findings in the CCD patient. (a) Shoulder mobility test revealed that the patient's shoulders cannot be brought closer. (b) Lateral photograph of the patient showed hypoplasia of the maxilla and a concave profile. (c) Oral manifestation revealed retention of deciduous teeth and a high-arched palate with a median pseudocleft. (d) Chest PA revealed thick and short clavicles with a bell-shaped thoracic cage. (e) Anteroposterior cephalogram revealed a Wormian bone (★) at the lambdoidal sutures, aplasia of the frontal sinus, and dysplasia of the zygomatic bone. (f) Panoramic radiography developed from CBCT confirmed retention of deciduous teeth, multiple permanent teeth impaction and supernumerary teeth as well as the parallel-sided borders of the ascending ramus. (g) Lateral cephalogram developed from CBCT showed hypoplasia of the maxilla and nasal bridge. CBCT: Cone beam computed tomography; PA: Posterioanterior; CCD: Cleidocranial dysplasia.

Click here to view


Oral manifestations and radiographic features

Oral manifestations include an edge-to-edge occlusion of the anterior teeth, retention of deciduous teeth, and a high-arched palate with a median pseudocleft [Figure 1]c. The 18-year-old patient had merely five permanent teeth (16, 14, 11, 26, and 36) erupted on her first visit.

Chest posterioanterior view revealed a bell-shaped thoracic cage and short and thick clavicles [Figure 1]d]. Anteroposterior radiography revealed a plastic frontal sinus, Wormian bone, and dysplastic zygomatic bone [Figure 1]e. These symptoms were also previously observed in a CCD patient with T420I mutation in the PST domain.[20] The lateral cephalogram developed from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) showed maxillary hypoplasia [Figure 1]g. The panoramic radiography developed from CBCT confirmed deciduous teeth retention, permanent teeth impaction, and delayed development with abnormal roots and multiple supernumerary teeth. It also revealed the parallel-sided anterioposterior borders of the ascending ramus, slender and pointed coronoid process facing upward, thin zygomatic arch and increased bone density between the anterior border of the ascending ramus and the inferior dental canal [Figure 1]f. The symptoms are consistent with those in the previous study.[3]

Mutation analysis

A novel single-base pair duplication: c.1111dupT in exon 8 was detected in the patient [Figure 2]a, causing a frameshift mutation ending at the consequent premature stop codon 384, which led to a truncated RUNX2 protein comprising merely 383 amino acids. The result was confirmed by Western blot analysis [Figure 2]b. The NMTS region was involved in this mutation.
Figure 2: Genetic sequencing and Western blot of wild-type RUNX2 and RUNX2 mutation. (a) Sequencing results showed the heterozygous duplicate mutant allele T. (b) Western blot confirmed the mutation that had 138 amino acids less than the wild type. GAPDH: Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; GFP: Green fluorescent protein; RUNX2: Runt-related transcription factor 2.

Click here to view


Nuclear localization of runt-related transcription factor 2 mutation

RUNX2 is localized in the cell nucleus and perinucleolar region.[14],[21],[22] The NMTS-associated subnuclear foci of RUNX2 are responsible for the transactivation of the osteoblast-specific osteocalcin gene in osseous cells.[14] To identify the nuclear localization of the RUNX2 mutation, we transfected both pEGFP-C1-RUNX2 and pEGFP-C1-RUNX2-mut plasmids into HEK293T cells. The subcellular localization of the wild-type RUNX2 and the mutation was observed by in situ immunofluorescence microscopy.

The RUNX2 mutation and wild-type RUNX2 accumulated in the nuclei of HEK293T cells [Figure 3]. However, the RUNX2 mutation was also observed in the perinuclear region and cytoplasm, which indicated that the subcellular compartmentalization of the RUNX2 mutation was partially perturbed.
Figure 3: Nuclear localization of RUNX2 mutation. Wild-type RUNX2 was localized in the nuclei of HEK-293T cells, whereas RUNX2 mutation was observed in the nuclei and perinuclear region (←) and cytoplasm. DAPI: 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; GFP: Green fluorescent protein; WT: Wild-type RUNX2; MUT: RUNX2 mutation; HEK: Human embryonic kidney; RUNX2: Runt-related transcription factor 2.

Click here to view


Transcription activation's abilities

To examine the effect of the RUNX2 proteins on the transactivation activity of HEK293T cells, we conducted DNA co-transfection experiments in HEK293T cells with the RUNX2-responsive osteocalcin promoter (p6OSE2-luc) as the reporter. Wild-type RUNX2 increased the promoter activity in transient transfection assays, whereas the transactivation function of the RUNX2 mutation was abrogated [Figure 4].
Figure 4: Transcription activation abilities. Transcriptional effects of the wild-type and mutant RUNX2 on osteocalcin promoter in HEK-293T cells. Luciferase activities were measured, and the value (ratio between firefly and Renilla luciferase) was obtained from the control group (empty vector) as one fold. Values are mean SD of independent experiments performed in triplicate. Results were examined by Student's t-test. t-value is 12.349, 10.334, and 7.017 separately for each quantity of transfection plasmids. *P < 0.05 versus WT. HEK: Human embryonic kidney; WT: Wild-type RUNX2; MUT: RUNX2 mutation; CON: Empty control; NS: Nonsignificant difference; SD: Standard deviation; RUNX2: Runt-related transcription factor 2.

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


In the current study, we confirmed a novel RUNX2 mutation in a sporadic Chinese patient with symptoms of CCD. The mutation leading to a frameshift from codon 371 to the premature stop codon 384 is responsible for the haploinsufficiency of RUNX2, and therefore causes the disease. The RUNX2 mutation resulted in the absence of the NMTS domain and C-terminal pentapeptide VWRPY. The NMTS near the C-terminal of RUNX2 comprises 38 amino acids (from amino acid 397 to 434), forming a helix-loop-helix structure.[23] According to a previous study, the NMTS domain is responsible for RUNX2 retention in nuclear matrix-associated foci and important for the optimal activation of the bone-specific osteocalcin gene.[14] Interactions with SMADs, histone deacetylase 6, and Yes-associated protein might play a role in the mechanisms of the NMTS-mediating protein subnuclear distribution.[24],[25] VWRPY interacts with a Groucho/TLE/R-esp repressor protein, and osteocalcin promoter is activated through a VWRPY-dependent mechanism.[21],[26] The VWRPY domain is not important for the retention of RUNX2 in nuclear matrix-associated foci.[14] In the present study, the nuclear import of the RUNX2 mutant was partially abrogated, which does not coincide with the conclusion of Zaidi et al.[14] The perinuclear leak of RUNX2 mutant expression might explain its decreased ability in activating downstream genes as shown in the results of the luciferase assay. The decreased ability could be partly modified by increasing the dose of the RUNX2 mutant plasmid, implying a correlation between the dosage and the abrogated function of the RUNX2 mutant.

CCD has a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms. According to the OMIM, CCD is related to over 48 phenotypic features. Previous studies were performed to explain the genotype-phenotype correlation, but their results were controversial.[27],[28],[29],[30],[31] A wide variation of phenotype expressivity even within a family with identical RUNX2 mutation was observed.[28],[31] A relationship between the stature and number of supernumerary teeth was observed.[12],[31] Cunningham et al.[19] suggested that the C-terminal mutations of RUNX2 lead to a more severe phenotype because of the negative effects caused by the preservation of the Runt domain. In contrast, Bufalino et al.[29] implied a correlation between the region affected by mutations involving the Runt domain and the severity of dental phenotypes. Although the mutation was outside the Runt domain, the patient presented with severe dental abnormalities. Previous cases[32],[33] revealed frameshift mutations in similar regions: c.1116_1119insC and c.1119delC. Both mutations demonstrated extremely similar craniofacial and dental phenotypes, including retained deciduous teeth, eruption failure of permanent dentition with abnormal roots, and multiple supernumerary teeth. However, more severe clavicle problems and spina bifida occulta were observed in the previous cases than in the present case. The difference might be attributed to environmental factors and epigenetic regulation including histone modifications and DNA methylation and copy number variation.

In summary, we identified a sporadic CCD patient carrying a novel insertion/frameshift mutation of RUNX2. This finding expanded our understanding of CCD-related phenotypes. Future studies of RUNX2 mutations may provide further insights into the phenotype-genotype correlation.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

This work was supported by a grant from the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81200762).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Shibata A, Machida J, Yamaguchi S, Kimura M, Tatematsu T, Miyachi H, et al. Characterisation of novel RUNX2 mutation with alanine tract expansion from Japanese cleidocranial dysplasia patient. Mutagenesis 2016;31:61-7. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gev057.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Kim HJ, Nam SH, Kim HJ, Park HS, Ryoo HM, Kim SY, et al. Four novel RUNX2 mutations including a splice donor site result in the cleidocranial dysplasia phenotype. J Cell Physiol 2006;207:114-22. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20552.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
McNamara CM, O′Riordan BC, Blake M, Sandy JR. Cleidocranial dysplasia: Radiological appearances on dental panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:89-97. doi: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600417.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Wu LZ, Su WQ, Liu YF, Ge X, Zhang Y, Wang XJ. Role of the RUNX2 p.R225Q mutation in cleidocranial dysplasia: A rare presentation and an analysis of the RUNX2 protein structure. Genet Mol Res 2014;13:1187-94. doi: 10.4238/2014.February.27.3.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Mundlos S. Cleidocranial dysplasia: Clinical and molecular genetics. J Med Genet 1999;36:177-82.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Banerjee C, McCabe LR, Choi JY, Hiebert SW, Stein JL, Stein GS, et al. Runt homology domain proteins in osteoblast differentiation: AML3/CBFA1 is a major component of a bone-specific complex. J Cell Biochem 1997;66:1-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(19970701) 66:1<1:AID-JCB1>3.0.CO;2-V.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Lee B, Thirunavukkarasu K, Zhou L, Pastore L, Baldini A, Hecht J, et al. Missense mutations abolishing DNA binding of the osteoblast-specific transcription factor OSF2/CBFA1 in cleidocranial dysplasia. Nat Genet 1997;16:307-10. doi: 10.1038/ng0797-307.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Otto F, Thornell AP, Crompton T, Denzel A, Gilmour KC, Rosewell IR, et al. Cbfa1, a candidate gene for cleidocranial dysplasia syndrome, is essential for osteoblast differentiation and bone development. Cell 1997;89:765-71. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80259-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Mundlos S, Otto F, Mundlos C, Mulliken JB, Aylsworth AS, Albright S, et al. Mutations involving the transcription factor CBFA1 cause cleidocranial dysplasia. Cell 1997;89:773-9. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80260-3.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Komori T, Yagi H, Nomura S, Yamaguchi A, Sasaki K, Deguchi K, et al. Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell 1997;89:755-64. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80258-5.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Kamamoto M, Machida J, Miyachi H, Ono T, Nakayama A, Shimozato K, et al. A novel mutation in the C-terminal region of RUNX2/CBFA1 distal to the DNA-binding runt domain in a Japanese patient with cleidocranial dysplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;40:434-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.09.025.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Yoshida T, Kanegane H, Osato M, Yanagida M, Miyawaki T, Ito Y, et al. Functional analysis of RUNX2 mutations in Japanese patients with cleidocranial dysplasia demonstrates novel genotype-phenotype correlations. Am J Hum Genet 2002;71:724-38. doi: 10.1086/342717.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Quack I, Vonderstrass B, Stock M, Aylsworth AS, Becker A, Brueton L, et al. Mutation analysis of core binding factor A1 in patients with cleidocranial dysplasia. Am J Hum Genet 1999;65:1268-78. doi: 10.1086/302622.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Zaidi SK, Javed A, Choi JY, van Wijnen AJ, Stein JL, Lian JB, et al. A specific targeting signal directs Runx2/Cbfa1 to subnuclear domains and contributes to transactivation of the osteocalcin gene. J Cell Sci 2001;114(Pt 17):3093-102.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Zhang YW, Yasui N, Ito K, Huang G, Fujii M, Hanai J, et al. A RUNX2/PEBP2alpha A/CBFA1 mutation displaying impaired transactivation and Smad interaction in cleidocranial dysplasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:10549-54. doi: 10.1073/pnas. 180309597.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Lo Muzio L, Tetè S, Mastrangelo F, Cazzolla AP, Lacaita MG, Margaglione M, et al. A novel mutation of gene CBFA1/RUNX2 in cleidocranial dysplasia. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2007;37:115-20.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Xuan D, Li S, Zhang X, Hu F, Lin L, Wang C, et al. Mutations in the RUNX2 gene in Chinese patients with cleidocranial dysplasia. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2008;38:15-24.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Tessa A, Salvi S, Casali C, Garavelli L, Digilio MC, Dotti MT, et al. Six novel mutations of the RUNX2 gene in Italian patients with cleidocranial dysplasia. Hum Mutat 2003;22:104. doi: 10.1002/humu.9155.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Cunningham ML, Seto ML, Hing AV, Bull MJ, Hopkin RJ, Leppig KA. Cleidocranial dysplasia with severe parietal bone dysplasia: C-terminal RUNX2 mutations. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2006;76:78-85. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20231.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Lee C, Jung HS, Baek JA, Leem DH, Ko SO. Manifestation and treatment in a cleidocranial dysplasia patient with a RUNX2 (T420I) mutation. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;37:41. doi: 10.1186/s40902-015-0042-0.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Javed A, Guo B, Hiebert S, Choi JY, Green J, Zhao SC, et al. Groucho/TLE/R-esp proteins associate with the nuclear matrix and repress RUNX (CBF (alpha)/AML/PEBP2(alpha)) dependent activation of tissue-specific gene transcription. J Cell Sci 2000;113(Pt 12):2221-31.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Young DW, Hassan MQ, Pratap J, Galindo M, Zaidi SK, Lee SH, et al. Mitotic occupancy and lineage-specific transcriptional control of rRNA genes by Runx2. Nature 2007;445:442-6. doi: 10.1038/nature05473.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Tang L, Guo B, Javed A, Choi JY, Hiebert S, Lian JB, et al. Crystal structure of the nuclear matrix targeting signal of the transcription factor acute myelogenous leukemia-1/polyoma enhancer-binding protein 2alphaB/core binding factor alpha2. J Biol Chem 1999;274:33580-6.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Afzal F, Pratap J, Ito K, Ito Y, Stein JL, van Wijnen AJ, et al. Smad function and intranuclear targeting share a Runx2 motif required for osteogenic lineage induction and BMP2 responsive transcription. J Cell Physiol 2005;204:63-72. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20258.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Westendorf JJ, Zaidi SK, Cascino JE, Kahler R, van Wijnen AJ, Lian JB, et al. Runx2 (Cbfa1, AML-3) interacts with histone deacetylase 6 and represses the p21(CIP1/WAF1) promoter. Mol Cell Biol 2002;22:7982-92.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Chen G, Courey AJ. Groucho/TLE family proteins and transcriptional repression. Gene 2000;249:1-16. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00161-X.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Suda N, Hamada T, Hattori M, Torii C, Kosaki K, Moriyama K. Diversity of supernumerary tooth formation in siblings with cleidocranial dysplasia having identical mutation in RUNX2: Possible involvement of non-genetic or epigenetic regulation. Orthod Craniofac Res 2007;10:222-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2007.00404.x.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Suda N, Hattori M, Kosaki K, Banshodani A, Kozai K, Tanimoto K, et al. Correlation between genotype and supernumerary tooth formation in cleidocranial dysplasia. Orthod Craniofac Res 2010;13:197-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01495.x.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Bufalino A, Paranaíba LM, Gouvêa AF, Gueiros LA, Martelli-Júnior H, Junior JJ, et al. Cleidocranial dysplasia: Oral features and genetic analysis of 11 patients. Oral Dis 2012;18:184-90. doi: 10.1111/j. 1601-0825.2011.01862.x.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Ryoo HM, Kang HY, Lee SK, Lee KE, Kim JW. RUNX2 mutations in cleidocranial dysplasia patients. Oral Dis 2010;16:55-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01623.x.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Zhang C, Zheng S, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Zhu J, Ge L. Mutational analysis of RUNX2 gene in Chinese patients with cleidocranial dysplasia. Mutagenesis 2010;25:589-94. doi: 10.1093/mutage/geq044.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Ding B, Li C, Xuan K, Liu N, Tang L, Liu Y, et al. The effect of the cleidocranial dysplasia-related novel 1116_1119insC mutation in the RUNX2 gene on the biological function of mesenchymal cells. Eur J Med Genet 2013;56:180-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2013.01.009.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Lee KE, Seymen F, Ko J, Yildirim M, Tuna EB, Gencay K, et al. RUNX2 mutations in cleidocranial dysplasia. Genet Mol Res 2013;12:4567-74. doi: 10.4238/2013.October.15.5.  Back to cited text no. 33
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed31    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded6    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal