Home About us Articles Multimedia Search Instructions Login 
IF 2017: 1.596 (® Clarivate Analytics)
Total Cites: 7606
Q2 in Medicine, General & Internal
Follow Us
Follow Us
  • Users Online: 3110
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 128  |  Issue : 21  |  Page : 2856-2860

Four Methods for Calculating Blood-loss after Total Knee Arthroplasty


1 Department of Orthopedics, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
2 Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
3 Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100037, China

Date of Submission24-May-2015
Date of Web Publication23-Oct-2015

Correspondence Address:
Zi-Jian Li
Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, 49, North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191
China
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.168041

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: Currently, various calculation methods for evaluating blood-loss in patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are applied in clinical practice. However, different methods may yield different results. The purpose of this study was to determine the most reliable method for calculating blood-loss after primary TKA.
Methods: We compared blood-loss in 245 patients who underwent primary unilateral TKA from February 2010 to August 2011. We calculated blood-loss using four methods: Gross equation, hemoglobin (Hb) balance, the Orthopedic Surgery Transfusion Hemoglobin European Overview (OSTHEO) formula, and Hb-dilution. We determined Pearson's correlation coefficients for the four methods.
Results: There were large differences in the calculated blood-loss obtained by the four methods. In descending order of combined correlation coefficient based on calculated blood-loss, the methods were Hb-balance, OSTHEO formula, Hb-dilution, and Gross equation.
Conclusions: The Hb-balance method may be the most reliable method of estimating blood-loss after TKA.

Keywords: Arthroplasty; Blood-loss; Calculation Method; Knee Replacement


How to cite this article:
Gao FQ, Li ZJ, Zhang K, Sun W, Zhang H. Four Methods for Calculating Blood-loss after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Chin Med J 2015;128:2856-60

How to cite this URL:
Gao FQ, Li ZJ, Zhang K, Sun W, Zhang H. Four Methods for Calculating Blood-loss after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Chin Med J [serial online] 2015 [cited 2018 Jul 20];128:2856-60. Available from: http://www.cmj.org/text.asp?2015/128/21/2856/168041


  Introduction Top


Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an extremely effective intervention for symptomatic osteoarthritis. However, it is associated with large amounts of perioperative blood-loss and high rates of transfusion. [1],[2],[3] Blood-loss may come from the osteotomized surface of the distal femoral and proximal tibial bones, release of the soft tissue injury area, and dredging of the marrow cavity. [3],[4] Chronic anticoagulant medication use and early rehabilitation of joint function have also resulted in postoperative anemia, which are common concerns for postoperative complication after TKA surgery. [3],[4],[5],[6]

Currently, various calculation methods for evaluating blood-loss in TKA patients are applied in clinical practice. However, different calculation methods may yield different results. [1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14] In this study, we compared four methods that are commonly used to calculate the amount of blood-loss after primary TKA. Our goals were to provide theoretical support for the most reliable method and an experimental model to improve blood management in clinical practice.


  Methods Top


We retrospectively studied 245 consecutive patients who underwent TKA from February 2010 to August 2011. Of them, 29 were males and 216 were females with a mean age of 65.6 years (range: 56-78 years). The average body mass index (BMI) was 28.61 kg/m 2 (range: 17.45-40.15 kg/m 2 ). The preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) was 131.25 g/L (range: 97-171 g/L). Inclusion criteria included primary TKA, no previous history of coagulation disorders, normal coagulant function preoperatively, and availability of complete medical record data. Exclusion criteria included revisions, bilateral joint arthroplasty procedures, active intravascular clotting disorders, and acute large hemorrhage. The most common comorbidities of the cohort were hypertension (116 cases), diabetes (39 cases), cardiovascular disease (11 cases), and cerebrovascular disease (5 cases). The study was carried out in accordance with the ethical standards described by the Local Ethics Committee of National Health Commission and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University Third Hospital.

Calculation methods for evaluating blood-loss

We calculated the amount of blood-loss after primary TKA in the same group of patients using four common calculation methods: Gross equation (method 1), Hb-balance (method 2), Orthopedic Surgery Transfusion Hemoglobin European Overview (OSTHEO) formula (method 3), and Hb-dilution (method 4) [Table 1]. Demographic data, BMI, preoperative diagnosis, type of anesthesia, medical comorbidities, preoperative autologous blood donation, allogeneic blood transfusion, and pre- and post-operative complete blood count (CBC) including hematocrit (Hct); and Hb levels were evaluated.
Table 1: The specific computing process of four common calculated methods

Click here to view


Perioperative management

All procedures were primary and unilateral. All patients underwent a standard operation using a medial parapatellar approach. All TKAs were performed under tourniquet pressure, which was released at the end of the procedure after application of a pressure bandage. Wound drainage was connected to an autologous blood transfusion system (CBC II ConstaVac Blood Conservation Kit; Stryker, USA) as the tourniquet was deflated. The drained blood was autofiltered and retransfused during the 1 st 6 h after the operation. Six hours later, the amount of drainage was recorded. The drain was removed 48 h after surgery. Low-molecular-weight heparin 4000-6000 U subcutaneously or aspirin 150 mg orally was administered postoperatively. Hb concentration was monitored and patients with Hb <80 g/L received red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. The amount of transfusion was recorded. When the anesthesia wore off, patients were instructed to exercise the ankle joint and perform muscular contraction exercises. Venous ultrasound of the lower limbs was performed in all patients to rule out deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Patients can ambulate with mobility aids 2-3 days after the operation and the stitches were removed 2 weeks after surgery. The complications after the surgery were readily managed by the appropriate measures, including DVT (calf muscular venous thrombosis, 63 cases), cerebral infarction (3 cases), urinary tract infection (2 cases), and pulmonary infection (2 cases).

Statistical analysis

All data analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows, version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The independent samples (or two-sample) t-test was used to compare the means of blood-loss obtained using the four calculation methods. Pearson's correlation analysis was applied to measure the similarity in blood-loss between pairwise results yielded by the four methods. An r-matrix of Pearson's correlation coefficient for pairwise comparison of blood-loss volume among the four methods was established. The size of the combined correlation coefficient (r value) reflected the degree of the relationship between an index and the other indexes, which indicated the relative reliability of the method. [15] The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.


  Results Top


The results of blood-loss volume for each calculation method are shown in [Table 2]. The methods were listed in descending order by means of calculated blood-loss volume after surgery. There were large differences among the calculated results of blood-loss after primary TKA for the four methods except between methods 1 and 2. The r-matrix of Pearson's correlation coefficient, constructed from the pairwise comparisons among the four methods, is shown in [Table 2], [Table 3] and [Table 4]. The larger the combined correlation coefficient (r value) was, the greater the degree of the relationship between an index and the other indexes. The combined correlation coefficients (Cr) of the four methods, calculated from the results as shown in [Table 4], were Cr 1 = 1.389, Cr 2 = 1.685, Cr 3 = 1.641, and Cr 4 = 1.493.
Table 2: BL volume calculate by different methods (n = 245, ml)

Click here to view
Table 3: Results of t-tests pairwise comparison among four methods by which BL calculated

Click here to view
Table 4: The r-matrix of Pearson correlation coefficient of the pairwise BL among four methods

Click here to view


The results obtained from the different methods varied greatly. When sorted in descending order of the combined correlation coefficient based on the calculated blood-loss yields, the methods were Hb-balance, OSTHEO formula, Hb-dilution, and Gross equation. The Hb-balance method may be the most reliable way to estimate the blood-loss after TKA.


  Discussion Top


The present study revealed large differences among the calculations of blood-loss after primary TKA using the four methods. Results for Hb-balance and the Gross equation were similar. However, they were found to be significantly different from the other methods. The OSTHEO formula produced the largest calculated blood-loss while the Hb-dilution method produced the smallest. Among the four calculation methods, Hb-balance method may be the most reliable of the four methods for estimating blood-loss after TKA.

The Hb-balance method is based on the balance of Hb during the perioperative period of primary TKA surgery. [4],[16],[17] It is regarded as an important method with intuitive expressiveness and high accuracy and often addresses contemporary clinical issues. Many scholars [1],[4],[5],[7] chose this method to investigate the composition and mechanism of blood-loss after TKA surgery, thus that corroborated the clinical utility and rationality of the method. It is a scientifically logical method which widely applied to measure postoperative blood-loss. Our study also supported this view. While it is sometimes necessary to measure the concentration of Hb in postoperative drainage, the complexity of the clinical procedure, and increased medical costs, poor patient compliance limits the use of this method in our clinical practice.

The method described by Gross [2] for calculation of blood-loss after arthroplasty surgery is popular among surgeons. As blood-loss is occurring, the patient's circulating volume will tend to fall. However, the simultaneous shift of fluid into the circulating compartment and fluid administered perioperatively maintain the circulating volume, although with increasingly more dilute blood and the Hct gradually falls. The RBC loss, as hemorrhage, continues logarithmically. [3] In 1980, Ward et al. [18] published a mathematical solution to the shift of circulating volume and the concept was taken forward by Gross [2] in 1983. A new linear formula using the patient's average Hct during the perioperative course was proposed. Gross tested this in patients undergoing surgery. It was found that the Gross equation [2] closely approximated the logarithmic one unless there was substantial or brisk hemorrhage causing the formulas to drift from the normal baseline. For this reason, cases with large losses were excluded from this study. Because individual factors such as gender, height, weight, and volume of blood transfusion are taken into consideration, the Gross equation reflects actual postoperative blood-loss to some extent. This results in its extensive application in medical practice. However, the Gross equation does not involve Hb-related factors. Actual blood-loss and anemia are revealed by the calculated perioperative volume and the changing Hct, [19] which may be the limitations of this method.

The OSTHEO formula was developed by multiple research centers based on the OSTHEO study. [8],[9],[10],[11],[20] The OSTHEO study was a prospective study designed to examine blood management practices before, during, and after total knee and total hip arthroplasty in Europe and to determine factors that predicted the risk associated with allogeneic transfusion. Specifically, the study examined various factors related to blood collection and transfusion, including blood wastage, pre- and post-operative Hb evolution, transfusion-associated complications, and predictors of the likelihood of allogeneic transfusion. Better strategies for blood transfusion can be developed if the calculated total blood-loss is known. [9],[21] The following demographic data associated with this study were collected: Date of birth, gender, country, height, and weight. Comorbid conditions, baseline Hb level, information concerning transfusion alternatives, the use and route of iron supplementation, and the use and total dose of recombinant human erythropoietin were also recorded. [9],[10],[11] Our results confirmed previous findings, yet also highlighted differences specific to European clinical practice. In addition, for the first time, blood usage for these types of surgeries was evaluated by calculating total perioperative blood-loss. A comprehensive blood management program for patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasties minimizes the requirement for allogeneic transfusion. [9],[22],[23] Such a program would optimize patient management and would reduce complications associated with anemia and blood transfusions in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty. The OSTHEO formula objectively describes the factors involved in perioperative blood-loss and effectively links to its used-blood management techniques, but the many variables involved make computations too complex. In addition, the blood volume calculated using the classic formula in the Gross equation was 0.35 m 2 less than that calculated using body surface area in the OSTHEO formula [Table 1]. This makes the two numeric variables significantly different (t = −8.075, P = 5.3 × 10−15 ). Its reason may be that the design of the formula itself results in a significant difference. Therefore, different designs of the formula itself may also be one of the reasons for the large deviation of calculated results.

Analysis of Hb-dilution after bleeding is a simple, inexpensive, and noninvasive method for estimating the blood-loss. Blood volume is estimated taking gender, weight, and height into consideration. The Hb concentrations before and after blood-loss were analyzed; assuming a normovolemic subject, the blood-loss volume can be calculated from the difference. Although widely used, this method has never been validated. [6] However, the value obtained using this method has been reported to be much smaller than another method. A study by Meunier et al. [14] calculated the blood-loss using the Hb-dilution method and compared the calculated value with the donated blood volume. The authors showed that the Hb-dilution method underestimates true blood-loss by more than 30% after moderate blood-loss of approximately 10% of the total blood volume. This is consistent with our findings in the present study. However, a requirement for correct calculation is a strictly normovolemic patient. Meunier et al. [14] demonstrated that blood volume is not fully normalized within a few days after an acute blood-loss. In most studies evaluating perioperative bleeding, the Hb concentration has been analyzed on the 2 nd to 4 th day after surgery. [2],[3],[24] The lowest Hb concentration caused by Hb-dilution following redistribution of fluid from the extravascular to the intravascular space was observed on day 6 after blood donation. [14],[24],[25],[26] However, at this point, the Hb concentration was still higher than expected from blood-loss. [24] Because of this underestimation, the Hb-dilution method is in our opinion not suitable for calculation of the absolute blood-loss volume but can be used to produce a rough estimate. [14] This also suggests a limitation of the Hb-dilution method.

Because of the complexity and variability of the mechanism of perioperative blood-loss from TKA surgery, different calculation methods may lead to different blood-loss determinations. Currently, the specific mechanism of hidden blood-loss formation is still unknown. Many methods are based on certain assumptions and simulation experiments, which may differ greatly from clinical situations. Therefore, future studies should focus on the mechanism of postoperative blood-loss from arthroplasty in order to obtain more reliable calculation methods.

There are some limitations in this study. So far, the mechanisms of blood-loss after TKA have not been very clear. The methods are mainly based on the supported literature and the previous clinical observation. This study is limited by virtue of the retrospective analysis. There was no randomized and blinded control group with four methods in this study. However, we believed that the methods and results in the same patient population in this study did not affect the overall outcomes. Because there is no "gold standard" for calculated method, we used the combined correlation coefficient to evaluate the reliability of the four methods. The size of the combined correlation coefficient (r value) which we chose reflected the degree of relationship between an index and other indexes, which indicated the relative reliability of the method (refer to the statistical method described by Chen). [15] We recognized that this was where the problem of the statistical method used in the manuscript lies.

In conclusion, blood-loss volume calculated using different methods varies greatly. The Hb-balance method may be the most reliable method for estimating blood-loss after TKA.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the members of the Department of Epidemiology and Bio-statistics, School of Public Health, Peking University for help with the statistical analysis, and Tao Wang (experienced nurse) for help with data collection.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Nadler SB, Hidalgo JH, Bloch T. Prediction of blood volume in normal human adults. Surgery 1962;51:224-32.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Gross JB. Estimating allowable blood loss: Corrected for dilution. Anesthesiology 1983;58:277-80.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Sehat KR, Evans RL, Newman JH. Hidden blood loss following hip and knee arthroplasty. Correct management of blood loss should take hidden loss into account. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:561-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Good L, Peterson E, Lisander B. Tranexamic acid decreases external blood loss but not hidden blood loss in total knee replacement. Br J Anaesth 2003;90:596-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Lisander B, Ivarsson I, Jacobsson SA. Intraoperative autotransfusion is associated with modest reduction of allogeneic transfusion in prosthetic hip surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998;42:707-12.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Meunier A, Lisander B, Good L. Effects of celecoxib on blood loss, pain, and recovery of function after total knee replacement: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Acta Orthop 2007;78:661-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Foss NB, Kehlet H. Hidden blood loss after surgery for hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88:1053-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Rosencher N, Boucebci KJ, Menichella G, Kerkkamp H, Macheras G, Munuera L, et al. Orthopaedic Surgery Transfusion Haemoglobin European Overview: The OSTEO study (extended abstract). Transfus Clin Biol 2001;8:211-3.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
Rosencher N, Kerkkamp HE, Macheras G, Munuera LM, Menichella G, Barton DM, et al. Orthopedic Surgery Transfusion Hemoglobin European Overview (OSTHEO) study : Blood management in elective knee and hip arthroplasty in Europe. Transfusion 2003;43:459-69.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Mercuriali F, Inghilleri G. Proposal of an algorithm to help the choice of the best transfusion strategy. Curr Med Res Opin 1996;13:465-78.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
Brecher ME, Monk T, Goodnough LT. A standardized method for calculating blood loss. Transfusion 1997;37:1070-4.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.
Martinez V, Monsaingeon-Lion A, Cherif K, Judet T, Chauvin M, Fletcher D. Transfusion strategy for primary knee and hip arthroplasty: Impact of an algorithm to lower transfusion rates and hospital costs. Br J Anaesth 2007;99:794-800.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.
Charrois O, Kahwaji A, Vastel L, Rosencher N, Courpied JP. Blood loss in total hip arthroplasty for rapidly destructive coxarthrosis. Int Orthop 2001;25:22-4.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.
Meunier A, Petersson A, Good L, Berlin G. Validation of a haemoglobin dilution method for estimation of blood loss. Vox Sang 2008;95:120-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.
Chen Z. Comparative analysis, 4 calculating methods for human body surface area. Chin J Sports Med 2003;22:576-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Gong L, Dong JY, Li ZR. Effects of combined application of muscle relaxants and celecoxib administration after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on early recovery: A randomized, double-blind, controlled study. J Arthroplasty 2013;28:1301-5.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.
Smith GH, Tsang J, Molyneux SG, White TO. The hidden blood loss after hip fracture. Injury 2011;42:133-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.
Ward CF, Meathe EA, Benumof JL. A computer nomogram for blood loss replacement. Anesthesiology 1980;53 Suppl 3:S126.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Prasad N, Padmanabhan V, Mullaji A. Blood loss in total knee arthroplasty: An analysis of risk factors. Int Orthop 2007;31:39-44.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]    
20.
Schnurr C, Csécsei G, Eysel P, König DP. The effect of computer navigation on blood loss and transfusion rate in TKA. Orthopedics 2010;33:474.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Park JH, Rasouli MR, Mortazavi SM, Tokarski AT, Maltenfort MG, Parvizi J. Predictors of perioperative blood loss in total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:1777-83.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]    
22.
Konig G, Hamlin BR, Waters JH. Topical tranexamic acid reduces blood loss and transfusion rates in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013;28:1473-6.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]    
23.
Li C, Nijat A, Askar M. No clear advantage to use of wound drains after unilateral total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized, controlled trial. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:519-22.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Valeri CR, Dennis RC, Ragno G, Macgregor H, Menzoian JO, Khuri SF. Limitations of the hematocrit level to assess the need for red blood cell transfusion in hypovolemic anemic patients. Transfusion 2006;46:365-71.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]    
25.
McConnell JS, Shewale S, Munro NA, Shah K, Deakin AH, Kinninmonth AW. Reducing blood loss in primary knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomised controlled trial of tranexamic acid and fibrin spray. Knee 2012;19:295-8.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]    
26.
Ajwani SH, Jones M, Jarratt JW, Shepard GJ, Ryan WG. Computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement: A comparison of tourniquet time, blood loss and length of stay. Knee 2012;19:606-10.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]


This article has been cited by
1 Is fast reversal and early surgery (within 24 h) in patients on warfarin medication with trochanteric hip fractures safe? A case-control study
Leif Mattisson,Lasse J. Lapidus,Anders Enocson
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2018; 19(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Bone Wax Is Effective in Reducing Blood Loss after Total Knee Arthroplasty
Ing How Moo,Jerry Yong Qiang Chen,Eric Hernandez Pagkaliwaga,See Wei Tan,Kein Boon Poon
The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2016;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Commentary on "clinical efficacy of tranexamic acid administration via different routes during total hip arthroplasty: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial"
Ido Badash,Brian Wu
Clinical and Translational Orthopedics. 2016; 1(3): 121
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1823    
    Printed20    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded567    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal




京ICP备05052599号